The six years before and then among adults is still 3.3 so it only doubled among teenagers throughout the early 90s. Nine of 297. Now we move ourselves up in a 2003 pot smoking declined slightly among teenagers. It increases a bunch to 17.2 among 18 to 25-year-olds and a little bit among the adults and finally to 2009 where were at now declined again among the teenagers increased a little among the young adults to 18.
6 and increased again amongst the adults to 4.5. So what I'm seeing here in and what I'm trying to show is that this fear that the big tobacco is there the big marijuana is going to target the kids possess where the business is doesn't seem to match what were seeing here with the data right.
It seems like the business is in that 18 to 25-year-old group now if asked what they're worried about you. What about the children were at talk about adult teams. I know what I was making argument with before. He said that this beginning age is the highest uses 17 that the initiation and that is not young I'm sorry these are now that they are called young adults are nice children anymore.
So stop you know you want the one about maggots into the you know the thorny discussion of the you know what age should it be if there's an age where a and you know the same people will argue well the brain doesn't stop developing tools, 25, Weldon's appeal college that exact pot luck.
If we are now ages 21 and back wages. 18. If we were grading ages by relative harm the marijuana age would be three so obviously not see overuse and we allow 18-year-olds to get cigarettes and some states 19. In some states right. Why, why do we not hear for a big push from project Sam to raise the tobacco age 221 what they were trying that here in Oregon which I think was smart.
I actually would like that I did when he proposed the bill. Some people thought that it was kind of like a joke but I may sense you know why not. If the is that it brings the Lavelle. They were trying to reduce harm age of 21 now the most recent national survey.
6 and increased again amongst the adults to 4.5. So what I'm seeing here in and what I'm trying to show is that this fear that the big tobacco is there the big marijuana is going to target the kids possess where the business is doesn't seem to match what were seeing here with the data right.
It seems like the business is in that 18 to 25-year-old group now if asked what they're worried about you. What about the children were at talk about adult teams. I know what I was making argument with before. He said that this beginning age is the highest uses 17 that the initiation and that is not young I'm sorry these are now that they are called young adults are nice children anymore.
So stop you know you want the one about maggots into the you know the thorny discussion of the you know what age should it be if there's an age where a and you know the same people will argue well the brain doesn't stop developing tools, 25, Weldon's appeal college that exact pot luck.
If we are now ages 21 and back wages. 18. If we were grading ages by relative harm the marijuana age would be three so obviously not see overuse and we allow 18-year-olds to get cigarettes and some states 19. In some states right. Why, why do we not hear for a big push from project Sam to raise the tobacco age 221 what they were trying that here in Oregon which I think was smart.
I actually would like that I did when he proposed the bill. Some people thought that it was kind of like a joke but I may sense you know why not. If the is that it brings the Lavelle. They were trying to reduce harm age of 21 now the most recent national survey.